This Petition is awaiting more public awareness.

 

The urgent need for Jasons Law will help protect vulnerable families from possible Police Social Service collusions and abuses. This petition is to prevent the imminent risk of a mother’s known psychiatric problems and suicidal tendencies from murdering her children before committing suicide. Please save them.

 

On the 19th November 2012 a group of senior ranked Liverpool Police officers headed by Jon, Eddie and Joanne created conditions which facilitated, then allowed the execution of commercial Pilot Mr Jason Osu in their attempts to have his brother Mark murdered.

 

Mark was saved by chance when during a journey home Jason decided he would take Mark home first. Twelve minutes after alighting from the vehicle Jason arrived home when two gunmen emerged both shooting from either side of Jason’s vehicle expecting both witnesses in a custody battle, Mark and Jason together.

 

Jason was a loving caring husband and father of two. The Police have publically confirmed Jason was not known to them nor had any links to crime. At the time of Jason being murdered both brothers were securing contracts relating to anti-terrorist measures with a foreign Government Jason was also a currency stock trader.

 

Mark and Jason were originally due to give evidence on the 19th November 2012 in a custody battle in which Mark was seeking custody of his children after the mother developing severe psychosis. Her Police handlers denied the psychosis and labelled her “their informant” and began using her to attack Mark, it’s believed to incite him to retaliate so they could take action against him.

 

In the 1990’s Mark investigated and exposed a group of senior ranking officers operating similar to an organised crime group within Liverpool Police Force. His investigation came about after they attempted to bring a malicious prosecution against him. He later received £22,500 in an out of court settlement from the Force. One of those he investigated was Jon and a number of accomplices. After murder was achieved, Jon appointed Mr Shaw to investigate the murder to ensure evidence linking the mother to the gunmen was disregarded.

 

A Public Judicial Inquiry will determine if Mark’s investigation into Jon and his associates in the 1990’s was the reason for the exploitation of his wife’s psychosis, the horrific abuse of his children and the murder of his brother or if these are common practices being conducted secretly.

If so, it is possible hundreds or thousands of murders and suicides are occurring each year which are not being attributed to collusion between Police and Social workers to incite parent conflict but rather the offence stemming from the covert incitement.

 

In 2007, the mother developed mental health problems when her son (by another father) underwent emergency, life threatening surgery. Due to the psychosis the mother made false allegations to the Police. It was unknown at the time the mother’s Police handlers were trained at Bruche Police training centre. Bruche was closed down on the instructions of the Home Office after officers appeared in the National press wearing Ku Klux Klan hoods expressing extreme racist behaviour. A BBC documentary screened officers stating the victim of a racist murder “Steven Lawrence got what he deserved” and “his killers should have been given diplomatic immunity”.

 

The officer’s handling the mother repeatedly provoke and encourage her to attack Mark all the while protecting her from prosecution. Between 2007 and 2010 great effort was taken to ensnare and control her psychosis, all to no avail. Mark was managing her bouts of psychosis incredibly well. But by March 2010 using social workers Joan, Michele and Margret they split both parents. They isolated the mother and continued to deny her psychosis. Isolated and mentally vulnerable Police employee Joanne and Eddie with social workers Joan and Michele befriend the vulnerable mother. They now convinced her Mark was responsible for her uncomfortable living conditions. After taking control of her Joanne began guiding and encouraging her to attack Mark for Mark to retaliate so Joanne would have reason to arrest Mark. No matter what the mother did to him, he refused to respond.

 

Denied psychiatric help, her condition deteriorated rapidly. Unpredictable violent abusive outbursts were followed with paranoia, hallucinations severe depression and persecutory delusions causing the children to suffer horrific child abuse.

 

Due the psychosis, between 2007 and 2010 Mark was arrested numerous times. During each interview he repeatedly requested the officers help her by encouraging a psychiatric assessment. They refused. She rejected Mark’s efforts to agree to a psychiatric assessment. He was left with no choice but to gather audio and video evidence to prove the psychosis abusing his children.

 

In October 2010, Mark’s solicitor agreed with her Police handlers request that Mark voluntarily attend a police station on the 1st November 2010 with regards allegations made by the mother. When this was agreed, unbeknown to Mark, officers instructed social worker Joan and Margret to arrange a family hearing for the 1st November 2010 in the secret courts to obtain an order denying Mark access to or contact with his children for life.

 

On the 1st November 2010, Mark duly attended the police station. Text message evidence on his phone proving his innocence (that he had provided to her police handlers in September 2010) had been deleted and replaced with neutral innocent texts while in police possession. As the evidence was not available to prove his innocence, on the 1st November 2010, officers instructed the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to imprison Mark while he awaited trial.

 

Whilst he was being questioned at the station, social worker Joan attended a secret court. There, Joan submitted a report stating social services were unaware of Mark’s views and opinions about his children because they had no contact details for him. Mark had sent an email to Joan and Margret eight weeks prior to them submitting their report to the court providing his contact details to Joan and Margret. Although committing perjury by lying to the Court. Police have not charged Joan or Margret with their crime. Since social service involvement, Mark had sent over 300 pages of emails to socials services expressing his grave concerns about the mother’s psychosis and abuse of his children. Unaware of this, the secret court granted the social services’ request.

 

On the 2nd November 2010, the CPS concealed from magistrates and a family court three crucial statements provided by the mother stating she had mental health problems. One read “from rereading my dairy I have learnt that from eight to ten weeks I live in another World”. Her statements confirmed Mark’s statements to the police and CPS. Her statements confirmed she had lied about Mark; she stated that he was a good father and husband, and that he had not done any of the things she previously alleged. Her statements pleaded for help with her mental health problems.

An independent examination of Mark’s phone revealed 39 text messages that proved his innocence had been deleted and replaced with neutral, innocent text messages. Text messages such as “fu**ing nigger…I am going to kill”, were replaced with “Hiya love will you book me a sunbed please”.  Other deleted texts read “I’m thinking of taking you out completely…”you fu***ing nigger I will kill…I will do my jail…if you don’t bring me a car and money I’m gonna make two more statements…I want £2,500”. With the psychosis untreated and the officers’ receiving training at Bruche, possibly converted a mentally mother with mixed race children into an extreme racist killer.

 

On the 16th February 2011, police telephonic expert Mr Alan Mills of Forensic Telecommunications Services provided a statement claiming the identifications of the text messages (that undermined the prosecution case) and their removal and replacement was due to ‘the limitations of the software’.

 

On the 22nd February 2011, Mark provided evidence of the text messages’ deletion, removal and replacement while in police possession to High court judge His Hon Judge Gilmour whom announced “the police and CPS started off on a false basis…you are free to leave”. It had cost Mark five months in prison awaiting trial although a totally innocent man.

 

Mark returned to social services informing them of His Hon Judge Gilmour’s findings. Social services refused to acknowledge the findings. This refusal to accept wrongdoing with the Police and CPS on the 1st November 2010 necessitated a custody battle. The date set to challenge the custody battle was the 19th November 2012, the date Jason is later executed.

 

Almost immediately after Mark began custody proceedings, the mother began sending him death threats. These were forwarded to the police by Derek Twigg MP over a 17 month period. The officers ignored them.

 

The CPS and Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) was aware of repeated death threats from the mother over the 17 month period prior to Jason being executed. They therefore failed to prevent his execution.

 

On the 3rd October 2012, Mark sent 17 members of the Police Authority a letter requesting that they help because the police, CPS and the IPCC were deliberately failing to prevent the threats from being carried out. The letter stated that the mother had sent a recent threat to have family members “shot dead” if they did not stop trying to have her and her police handlers investigated for deleting the text messages.

 

Six weeks after the Police Authority received the letter, the planned double execution that led to Jason being “shot dead” took place. The vehicle used by the perpetrators of Jason’s execution was recovered in the mother’s relative’s street – yards from a number of relatives address which she had been a regular and frequent visitor for more than 30 years.

 

In April 2013, after what the murder team described as five months of extensive forensic examination, the team returned the vehicle Jason was murdered in to his family. Two still blood stained bullets which had killed Jason had been left casually in the foot well. It’s believed this was to incite Mark to retaliate for the murder of his beloved brother Jason.

 

It’s believed the investigating team have once again deleted telephonic evidence linking the mother to the murderers.

 

In April 2013, Cheshire Chief Constable Mr Whatton provided a report to Liverpool Police crime Commissioner Ms Jane Kennedy MP. The report stated that the lifesaving letters were received by the Police Authority, but were thrown in the bin on the instructions of the chief executive (with the exception of one copy, which was filed).

 

In March 2012 Ms Miriam Davies of the IPCC (Manchester) filed a report. In the report, Ms Davies stated the company that designed the software used by Mr Mills of Forensic Telecommunications Services, Microsystemation (MSAB) informed her that the identification of the text messages and their deletion and replacement (which effectively converted the victim (Mark) into an offender and the offender (the mother) into a victim was due to “a bug” in their software (named XRY).

 

MSAB’s website states 97% of UK police forces use XRY software. This statement calls into question thousands, possibly millions, of convictions. This allowed the officers to continue exploiting the mothers psychosis, maintained the child abuse, leading to Jason being executed when he provided a witness statement attempting to stop the abuse.

 

To protect social services and the secret court decision on the 1st November 2010, in April 2013, secret court administrator Ms O’Leary found in favour of social services and against Mark. Ms O’Leary claimed that there is no psychosis, no child abuse, and nothing linking the mother to Jason Osu’s murder. This claim effectively left Mark’s children in the ‘care’ of a person Ms O’Leary is aware suffers suicide tendencies, lives in another World for weeks at a time and has developed traits now similar to a narcissistic sociopath and the prime suspect in the planned double murders of both witnesses against her resulting in Jason’s murder. Ms O’Leary decision risk’s the murder of Mark’s children and the suicide of their mother as he pursues Justice for his murdered brother simply to protect employees from prosecution. Hence our request to the Public for help.

 

This petition requests that there is a fair, unbiased Public Judicial Inquiry that asks:

 

1. Is this an isolated case or is the number of victim children and families in the hundreds or thousands?

2. Why was collusion between social workers and the officers not prevented, a collusion that ultimately facilitated the execution of Jason?

3. Why did officers not recommend the mother received psychiatric help prior to her having Jason murdered?

4. Why did officers and social workers allow the mother’s psychosis to subject the children to years of abuse – an abuse that continues to this day?

5. Why did officers ignore the mother’s threats to kill family members?

6. Why did officers refuse to take instructions from Derek Twigg MP to prevent the execution of Jason?

7. Why did social services refuse to acknowledge His Hon Judge Gilmour’s findings?

8. Why did the CPS and officers conceal the mother’s statements regarding her own concerns about her psychosis from the courts and from Mark?

9. Why did the murder team return the vehicle Jason was executed in with the two blood stain bullets that killed him casually left in the foot well?

10. Why did the IPCC fail to ensure the police prevented the execution from taking place?

11. Why did the CPS (Chief Prosecutor Mr Fryar) ignore the mothers’ death threats prior to Jason’s execution?

12. Why did secret court administrator Ms O’Leary make claims that protected social workers, sustained the child abuse, and denied the mother psychiatric help?

13. Why did Ms O’Leary ignore Mark’s warnings that the mother might murder his children before committing suicide?

14. Why does the system continue to ignore Mark’s warnings and disregard the possibility of this horrific scenario.

 

This petition exists to help save the lives of Mark’s children while there is still time. It is a heartfelt endeavour to bring the living victims of this injustice redress and a degree of closure, and the perpetrators of this tragedy to justice. Such justice is long overdue.

 

Please support the implementation of Jasons Law and calls for a Public Judicial Inquiry