JASONS LAW
Purposes to address collusion between Police and social services that are deliberately inciting violence between parents experiencing relationship difficulties causing countless murders suicides and horrific child abuses. It's believed thousands of these crimes are orchestrated each year. To protect state employees from criminal charges and conceal their crimes from public view. Decision makers in family hearings are exploiting child care Laws to silence with imprisonment the victims.

Is this present-day apartheid
Related video/audio evidence
Child Abuse Stemming
from mothers Psychosis
Secret Recording
Social Services
Recording Murder
Scene
Secret Recording
Social Services Barrister
Contact Us
500 Terry Francois St. San Francisco, CA 94158
info@mysite.com
Tel: 123-456-7890
Fax: 123-456-7890
One on One
​To most caring loving parents. Some may agree their children are the most important part of their lives. Police and Social workers can enter the private lives of citizens for the simplest and meekest of reasons.
If for whatever reason parents experience relationship difficulties. And for example their child is upset in school. This would be enough for social services to enter the private lives of a family. Social services then contact the Police for background checks.
Police and social service management of parent's difficulties is such a delicate issue. The public may well expect agencies to handle such a sensitive issue with extreme care. Police and social service employees are aware parents have been known to commit murder regarding children.
Police units known as Family Crime Investigation Units (FCIU) were created to manage parents experiencing difficulties. The FCIU have daily contact with their counterparts in social services. Over time some unhealthy liaisons and practices have developed. The FCIU have overall control of social services and instruct social workers how each family’s difficulties should be controlled.
FCIU employees are trained in parent conflict management strategies. These are designed to prevent parents resorting to conflict and violence. In far too many cases Police social service employees are deliberately configuring the conflict management strategy to incite conflict and violence between parents rather than avoiding it.
Conflict is achieved by Police and or social workers simply submitting malicious, dishonest disinformation in unsubstantiated reports which are placed before another State employee hearing Police Social Service employees allegations in family hearings.
The malicious targeting can be for a number of reasons including charactor conflict, prejudice, sex, religious beliefs and or social class.
If a social worker has no malicious intent and requests evidence from a Police employee. The Police employee can use a variety of claims to avoid providing evidence. These can include phrases such as “we cannot provide evidence for operational reason...We cannot provide evidence in order to protect the identity of the informant".
Such claims are provided unofficially. Phrases such as "intelligence” may well lead social workers with no malicious intent to believe the Police employees claims. Having no way of verifying the claims. The Social worker will follow the directive of the Police employee.
Using children effectively as bait. Social workers often target the mother. Using threats of forcibly removing her children in care or forced adoption. The mother is forced to eject the father from the home and childrens lives. If she fails to follow Police and social service directives her children will almost certainly be forcibly taken and place for adoption.
Some fathers disagree with the forced seperaton causing arguments between parents. Its suspected thousands of murders, suicides and child abuse cases occur each year as a direct result of malicious, dishonest claims alleged by Police and social service employees.
When a case of murder, suicide and or child abuse come before administrators in family proceedings they reject the parent’s assertions that malicious, dishonest claims alleged by Police and social service employees led to murder, suicide or child abuse. Rejecting the parent’s assertions protect state employees from potential criminal charges.
Mark Defends Accused to Ensure Aquittal
Using Text Defects to
Secure Aquittal
Pregnant Mother Stabbed
Ringleader & His Policing Background
Possible Motive
Reason
Crime Commissioner
Criminal Cover Up
Synopsis
The administrators then misuse child care laws to threaten parents with imprisonment if they attempt to report their loss and suffering via social media or the press. Journalists are prohibited access to what they have labelled the secret 'courts'. The hearings prohibit the press reporting such cases with claims the 'court' are protecting the identity and privacy of the children. Journalists fear imprisonment and legal action against their paper and avoid reporting these horrific cases. This is how these state sponsored child abuse and murder crimes are being concealed from public view.
​
It’s believed the reason the conflict management strategy was configured to incite violence that caused the murder of Jason was due to institutionalised racism. If correct a disproportionate number of these cases involving murder, child abuse and or suicide could be significantly higher within the minority community.
Police social service employees malicious dishonest claims aim to achieve the following key stages:
-
Establish Control Over Mother - Threats Forced Adoption of Children
-
​
-
Force Parent Separation - Instruct Mother Force Father to Leave Home/Children or Face Children Forced Adoption
-
​
-
Instruct Mother Deny Father Contact with His Children
-
​
-
Instruct Mother Obtain Restraining Order in Family Proceedings - Father Not to Approach Children/Home. Mother Informed Social Services Question Children at School to Ensure Instructions are Followed
-
​
-
If Father Challenges Police Social Service Directives in Family Proceedings - Dishonest Police Social Service Claims Ensure He Fails Application
-
​
-
If Father Breaches Order and Approaches His Children/Home/Mother - He is Imprisoned.
-
​
-
Whilst Imprisoned Social Workers Pressure Mother to Introduce knew Male to Father Children - Pevent Re-Establishment of Previous Relationship
-
​
-
No Mediation Offered
On release thousands of fathers are murdering the mother of their children each year. In some cases were the mother is murdered and the father is imprisoned for life. The victim children are taken into care creating more work for the secret courts administrators and social service employees. Most victims are vulnerable children and families from socially deprived areas.
If during a murder trial in the criminal courts. A parent claims that Police and social service malicious disinformation and the control of their difficulties played a key role in the parent murdering their partner. The prosecution may well successfully argue. This is no defence for committing murder.
Between 2011 and 2012 more than 10,000 British babies and children were forcibly taken from their parents on the directive of Police social service employees. Some babies are removed within hours of birth. This has fuelled a business for the isolation system deceivingly named the 'care system’.
In most of these cases. Children are too young to understand why they have been taken from their family, friends, school and isolated. They don't understand why their family have been disbanded and destroyed. Some children reject the isolation and destruction of their family.
This has led to a disproportionate number of these victim children being filed by social service employees as ‘abusive, rebellious, disruptive and or violent’. As a result a disproportionate number of these victim children are moved from the isolation 'care system', becoming adults isolated from society in the 'prison system'.
The secret recordings on this site provides evidence to prove beyond any reasonable doubt. That each and every stage of the current Police, social service and family court system is flawed and open to abuses by state employees.
Without a jury presiding in these proceedings. The secret courts will continue to remain a Law unto itself and will continue to serve its own verdict and punishment without question.
The recordings on this site provide evidence to prove agency employees are potentially responsible for thousands of murders and suicides each year. The recordings prove there is an urgent need to introduce jury's in family proceedings. This would prevent administrators such as Ms Michele O’Leary making decisions to protect state employees as opposed to protecting the vulnerable women, children and families Judge O’Leary was entrusted to protect.
There is a need to protect and safeguard vulnerable parents and children from abusive controlling and violent partners. Police and social services may have helped in this regard and possibly saved lives but more can be done to better protect our most vulnerable. There are no safeguarding measures to protect children and vulnerable parents from malicious dishonest allegations reported by people employed within the Police and Social services. The malicious reports incite violence between parents already experiencing relationship difficulties. This is causing countless murders, suicides and child abuses each year.
The implementation of Jasons Law will close this remaining loop hole to provide a better service for Police social service employees and those they are entrusted to protect. It could prevent institutionalised child abuse and murder going unseen thereby failing our most vulnerable in society. Your support for Jasons Law may well help prevent these needless murders, suicides and child abuse crimes being perpetrated by state employees with impunity.
Supreme Principle of Jasons Law​
​
When the State seeks to remove a person’s freedom for an alleged criminal offence. The public preside as 'jury' members to determine if the State has the right to remove a person’s freedom. The Judge decides sentence. Currently in family proceedings State employed decision makers Rule both as Judge and Jury. Appeals are help as such.
Jasons Law is based on the fundamental principle. If State employees seek to remove children from parents and their children are more important to parents than freedom. Then it may well be a more just system for the public to preside as 'jury' members to determine if the State has the right to remove children from parents.